
433. Robert Southey to Humphry Davy, [4 September 1799]*
Your Mounts-Bay, my dear Davy, disappointed me in its length.1 I expected more & wishd more, because what there is is good. there is a certain swell – an elevation in the flow of the blank verse, which I know not how, produces an effect like the fullness of an organ-swell upon the feelings. I have felt it from the rythm of Milton2 – & sometimes of Akenside3 – a pleasure wholly independant of that derived from the soul of the poetry, arising from the beauty of the body only – I believe a man who did not understand a word of it would feel pleasure & emotion at hearing such lines read with the tone of a poet. the character drawn of Theora is I think out of place – it is not a common character. & the story is no ways influenced by it. the passion to be excited is pity, not admiration.
I must not press the subject of poetry upon you – only do not lose the feeling, & the habit of seeing all things with a poets eye. at Bristol you have a good society – but not a man who knows any thing of poetry. Dr Beddoes’ taste is very pessimism. Cottles only likes what his friends & himself write. Every person fancies himself competent to pronounce upon the merits of a poem. & yet no trade no science requires so long an apprenticeship, or involves the necessity of such multifarious knowledge. I want an equal reader to judge my poems, one whose knowledge & taste is commensurate with mine, who has thought as much upon the subject – or else one who pretends not to criticise but will surrender his feelings to me & follow the impulse they receive.
It gave me pain to see Dr Beddoes’s Domiciliary Verses inserted in the Anthology.4 when I left Bristol a variance subsisted between myself & Coleridge. I had therefore reason on the score of delicacy not to make myself the means of publishing any thing designed as a ridicule either upon him or his friend Wordsworth, & those lines at the time they were written were handed about as such. this I requested Cottle to mention to Dr B. as a reason for not inserting them. he did so & Dr B replied that unless they were inserted, nothing of his should. the epigram5 was then already printed & Cottle did right not to offend the Doctor himself. But had I been then in Bristol, his poems should have been immediately returned & what was already printed cancelled. I respect Dr Beddoes – but in this instance he has acted with an indelicacy & a kind of arrogance which I never before experienced. for the second volume6 of course no application shall be made to him.
The second volume I hope to send to press early in November. sometimes remember this, & let it prevent <save> a poetizing impulse from being repelled.
I have been long idle, or rather lying fallow. after writing to you I walkd to the Valley of Stones & to Ilfracombe. on my return we remained a fortnight at Stowey with Coleridge, where Edith gradually recovered, & where with walking & talking I was compleatly occupied. we travelled together to Ottery St Mary – & after vainly seeking lodgings on the coast or in the villages near I found lodgings on Monday last at Mr Tuckers. Fore-Street-Hill. Exeter.7 whither direct. Coleridge is eleven miles distant at his brothers. he will pass some time here. we have formed the plan of a long poem to execute in hexameters. but this you had better not mention as it will need a strong preliminary attack to bully people out of their prejudices against innovations in metre. our story is Mohammed.8
At Lymouth I saw Tobins9 friend Williams10 who opened upon me with an account of the gazeous oxyd.11 I had the advantage of him, having felt what he it seems, had only seen. Lymouth where he is fixd is certainly the most beautiful place I have seen in England – so beautiful that all the after scenes come flat & uninteresting. it may xxxxxx the Valley of Stones is about half-a-mile distant, as a strange & magnificent which ought to have filled the whole neighbourhood with traditions of giants & devils & magicians. but I could find none – not even a lie preserved. I know too little of natural history to hypothesize upon the cause of this valley: it appeard to me that nothing but water could have so defleshed & laid bare the bones of the earth. that any inundation which could have overstopped these heights must have deluged the kingdom – but the opposite hills are clothed with vegetable with vegetable soil & verdure – therefore the cause must have been partial. a water-spout might have occasioned it perhaps – & there my conjectures rested – or rather took a new direction to the Preadamite Kings,12 the fiends who married Diocletians fifty daughters – their giant progeny13 – old Merlin14 & the builders of the Giants Causeway.15
For the next Anthology I project a poem on our Clifton Rocks.16 the scenery is fresh in my sight – & these kind of poems derive a more interesting cast as recollections than as immediate pictures.
farewell yours truly Robert Southey.
Exeter. Thursday May17 4. 99.
Notes
Address: [deletion and readdress in another hand] To/ Mr Davy/
Pneumatic Institution/ Hot Wells <Post Office minehead>/ Bristol. / Single
Stamped:
EXETER
Endorsement: May 99/ Exeter
MS: Royal Institution, London, Davy MSS. ALS; 4p.
Previously published: John Davy (ed.),
Fragmentary Remains, Literary and Scientific, of Sir Humphry Davy, Bart. (London, 1858), pp. 34–36 [in part;
misdated 4 May 1799].
Dating note: Southey dates this letter as ‘May 4.99’. But its contents, including
references to the
recently-published Annual Anthology (1799), Southey’s walking-tour in north Somerset and his new lodgings in Exeter,
all date the letter to early September 1799. Back
1. Humphry Davy, ‘Extract from an unfinished poem upon Mount’s-Bay’, Annual Anthology (Bristol, 1799), pp. 281–286. Back
2. John Milton (1608–1674; DNB). Back
3. Mark Akenside (1721–1770; DNB). Back
4. Thomas Beddoes’s ‘Domiciliary Verses’ appeared in Annual Anthology (Bristol, 1799), pp. 287–288. Back
5. Beddoes’s ‘On Some Modern Improvements in a Celebrated Spot in Gloucestershire’, Annual Anthology (Bristol, 1799), p. 248. Back
6. The second volume of the Annual Anthology was published in 1800. Back
7. Possibly the retired stationer and bookseller Richard Tucker (fl. 1779–1784), whose business had occupied premises on Fore-Street, Exeter. Back
8. Coleridge and Southey’s plan for a jointly-written poem in hexameters on Muhammad (570–632), the Prophet of Islam, did not make much progress. A fragment by Southey was published posthumously in Oliver Newman: a New-England Tale (London, 1845), pp. 113–116; and 14 lines by Coleridge in The Poetical Works of S. T. Coleridge, 3 vols (London, 1834), II, p. 68. For Southey’s notes for, and early sketch of, the poem see Common-Place Book, ed. John Wood Warter, 4 series (London, 1849–1850), IV, pp. 18–20. Back
9. Either the abolitionist James Webbe Tobin or his brother John Tobin (1770–1804; DNB), playwright. Back
10. Williams (first name and dates unknown) was the ‘natural son’ of Prince William Henry, Duke of Gloucester (1743–1805; DNB), Common-Place Book, ed. John Wood Warter, 4 series (London, 1849–1850), IV, p. 521. Back
11. Nitrous oxide, or ‘laughing gas’. Back
12. Both Christian and Muslim theologians had speculated about the existence on earth of non-human civilizations before the creation of Adam. William Beckford’s (1760–1844; DNB) An Arabian Tale, From An Unpublished Manuscript: With Notes Critical and Explanatory (London, 1786), pp. 196, 205, had popularised the notion and used the specific phrase ‘Pre-Adamite Kings’. Back
13. John Milton (1608–1674; DNB), ‘History of Britain’, The Works of John Milton, Historical, Political, and Miscellaneous. ... To Which is Prefixed, An Account of His Life and Writings, 2 vols (London, 1753), II, pp. 2–3. Back
14. Legendary wizard at the Court of King Arthur. Back
15. In legend, the Irish giant Finn McCool built the causeway in order to walk to Scotland to fight the Scottish giant Benandonner. Back
16. A series of rocks and cliffs in the Avon gorge, near the Bristol suburb of Clifton. For the plan of this poem see Common-Place Book, ed. John Wood Warter, 4 series (London, 1849–1850), IV, pp. 195–196. Back
17. May: Southey misdates, the letter was written in September. Back