1013. Robert Southey to Henry Herbert Southey, 8 January 1805*

Dear Harry

William Taylor tells me you have had your name entered at Cambridge & design to keep terms there. I am inclined to think he has mistaken the will for the deed, & misinterpreted the kakography1 of your letter,2 – for I do not think that you would take this step without first consulting both him & me, & I cannot conceive that you can need any advice at all upon the subject, it being so utterly impossible with your means, & so little desirable if <xxx> possible. I do not know any one thing which would be so certainly prejudicial to you as this which you are wishing for. In the first place you are too old – it being more usual to go under eighteen than above it. in the next place you would find yourself behind hand in University attainments – for the sake of obtaining immediate gratification you would devote yourself to these – which would lead to nothing, & you would find when too late that you had abandoned one pursuit – without getting any other. Be content as you are: repeated change of profession is folly in those who can afford it, – in you it would be something worse. what only makes them ridiculous would ruin you. An English degree is of no other use to a physician than as it enables him to be a Fellow of the College of Physicians. he may practice in London as a Licentiate without it.

You ask me concerning the origin of the Venereal Disease.3 Since the question arrived I have found the passage on which I suppose the common opinion is founded, & which is certainly irrefragable. It is in a work by Oviedo whose whole title you may <see> in one of the Madoc notes4 – so I need not hunt for it again. He says that the first Spaniards who went to the West Indies (N B where he was xxx settled) caught it there, where it was a very common but very mild disease – & he goes on with the history of the war at Naples &c to account for its names in France & in Italy. Possibly some analogous disease may have existed in Europe before, which was & this may have been a worse sort – as if the Small Pox had turned out the vaccine. Certain it is that till the discovery of America it was never known as a general & dreadful malady. If you want more particulars tell me, & I will translate the passage from Oviedo at length & send you chapter & verse.

As no proofs have reached me of late I conclude you are doing my office & that the work is nearly at an end.5 indeed every days delay is now injurious to the sale.

I lose money by Hamiltons failure6 – I know not what – from 10 to 30£. Philips has bought the Critical,7 & will most likely lift it with a better sale.

A Aikin has sent me another & last parcel which will take up a fortnights time.8 there is in it a Scotch Ode in folio or foolio addressed to Percy.9 We go this evening to the Generals.10 – No news of Tom – nor of Coleridge – nor of any thing public for the Iris is dead & gone.11 Your friend John12 is well. Our winter has been truly delightful. frost & sunshine all December. thaw & sunshine with passing showers now, & no snow yet in the valley, nor any remaining on the hills.

farewell RS.

Tuesday Jany 8. 1805.

Notes

Address: For/ H H Southey Esqr/ to the care of Mr Guthrie Bookseller/ Edinburgh –/ Single –
Stamped: KESWICK/ 298
Postmark: JAN/ 1805/ 10
MS: Bodleian Library, MS Don. d.3. ALS; 4p.
Unpublished. Back

1.   Southey uses this word to mean ‘bad writing’. Back

2.   Taylor had misunderstood; see Southey to Henry Herbert Southey, 24 January 1805, Letter 1025. Back

3.   Harry’s university dissertation, to graduate as MD, was on the origins and course of syphilis, in which he suggested an American origin for the disease. Back

4.   Gonzalo Fernández de Oviedo y Valdés (1478–1557), De la Natural Hystoria de las Indias (1526) is cited in Madoc (1805), in a note to Part 2, Book 8, lines 60–62. See Robert Southey: Poetical Works 1793–1810, gen. ed. Lynda Pratt, 5 vols (London, 2004), II, p. 327. Back

5.   For Madoc (1805) which was being printed by James Ballantyne in Edinburgh. Back

6.   Samuel Hamilton (dates unknown), owner of the Critical Review 1799–1804. His departure from the Critical left Southey unpaid for reviews he had written. Back

7.  The Critical Review was in fact bought by Joseph Mawman (1763–1827). Back

8.   Southey’s reviewing work for the Annual Review. Back

9.   Jessie Stewart (dates unknown), Ode to Dr. Thomas Percy (1804). Southey reviewed this work in the Annual Review for 1804, 3 (1805), 597. Back

10.   John Peche (dates unknown), who had served in the East India Company’s army, gazetted as Colonel in 1796 and Major-General in 1798. Back

11.  The Iris; or, Norwich and Norfolk Weekly Advertiser was the Norwich newspaper edited from 1803 by William Taylor. It had ceased publication by the end of 1804. Back

12.   Southey’s ass. Back